I’d like to first let everyone know that everything you
see here is a work in progress. The
intellectual property mentioned or illustrated in this post is for
non-commercial use only and is protected and should only be used by permission. Also, pressed for time I only had time to
snap photos of my spreadsheets so I apologize for the crude illustrations.
In my previous posts I referred to a scoring system I
developed for measuring the individual performance of a Supercross
athlete. In this post I will explain a couple
of spreadsheets I use in a fantasy game of sorts.
I don’t see many areas to improve my CLAW scores but I
know they can be refined. This whole
scoring process is uncovering a number of different statistical possibilities
that can keep me busy for some time. I’m working on
some really cool ideas but until then I’ve come up with a neat little way of playing Supercross
every week. The following slides are
what I’ll use for round 1 of the 2014 SX season; what I call preseason
scoring.
Fig. 1 CLAW Grid |
Figure 1 shows the CLAW score grid. The GREEN column is the individual rider
score and the ORANGE is the team scores.
These numbers are the result of many hours of statistical analysis in
conjunction with advanced analytics.
You’ll quickly notice that both 250 and 450 riders are scored
together. Normalizing the two classes
was the most complex function in the sequence but was essential in building a
comprehensive model. You may also notice
the results are not what you’d typically see in a box score. For example, notice how Villopoto is ranked
32 out of 36. What I did for the first
race is take my process through each riders' first performance of last season for scoring the preseason
race. In some instances I had to refer
back even farther like in the case of Josh Hill or in the case of Tomac and Roczen I used their 450 debut performance at Daytona since they're riding 450's this season. Of course it’s possible I’ll miss some riders
because anything can happen in qualifying.
For round two I’ll use round 1 scores and so on.
Fig. 2 Individual TRAP Grid |
Figure 2 shows the individual rider TRAP grid. This slide simply shows the riders on a grid
ranked highest to lowest. What I’ll use
this for is head-to-head challenges. I
would go around the grid matching each rider against his polar opposite and
choose the rider I believe will outscore the other, based on my CLAW scores of
course.
Figure 3 is the team TRAP grid. The selection process was quite simple; I
split the field in half and matched up each rider in descending order. I then combined their individual scores then
sorted from highest to lowest. With this
slide the object is to select the team you believe will outscore the other
using the same sequence as above.
Fig. 3 Team TRAP Grid |
I’ve been experimenting with brackets so stayed
tuned. My scores make this option so
much more interesting than using box scores because mine can be so
unpredictable from week to week; looks pretty cool especially if you like
wagering with friends and family.
So that’s
it. At this time I have no formal
platform for delivering my scores or playing the grid but I have some ideas in
the works. I’m busy refining and developing
new ways to employ the ideas set forth in this post so check back often. If you have any comments please don’t
hesitate to contact me at dirtlife.colorado@gmail.com
Look for
top 10 predictions as well. I had a ton
of fun last season and I hope to improve on my results this year. Thanks for checking in.
The Roost'r
No comments:
Post a Comment